I’m bored with all of the CCA letters to the editor written by the identical folks the place they declare CCA conservation accomplishments are of nice profit to all of Charlestown.
Some time in the past Warren Buffett wrote an attention-grabbing article asking: What donations are really respectable tax deductions? Do the donations assist society or simply protect a rich life-style? Donating to a meals financial institution could be supporting society. Donating to an alma mater could be preserving a way of life. He thought donations preserving existence needs to be questioned extra.
I take into account CCA’s so-called conservation to be genuinely an effort to protect their life-style. It’s an effort to gate-up Charlestown, making it unique. Between municipal, state and federal land the city already has loads of open area (ruralness) for the nice of the general public. So shopping for up land to maintain it off the market is a waste of taxpayers’ cash. It’s simply defending this rich life-style. Perhaps it’s my creativeness, however CCA enclaves appear to be surrounded (protected) by conservation land all of us paid for.
I’ve by no means earlier than seen such a protracted ordinance by any city for planning as Charlestown’s “Land Growth and Subdivision Regulation,” which was printed in The Westerly Solar on Oct 17. Now I see within the Oct. 25 Westerly Solar ordinance No. 397 for zoning. When you mix planning’s 4 newspaper pages and zoning’s two pages for a complete of six pages you may get a greater concept what the CCA is making an attempt to sneak into land-use rules. Some cities mix planning and zoning into one fee, avoiding this trick of dividing and complicated the general public. I take into account these two ordinances graphic proof the CCA is intentionally making any allowing so convoluted nothing can get permitted except it’s what they need; defending their life-style. There’s a lot confusion in these two ordinances the CCA-controlled Planning Fee (Ruth Platner, chairwoman) and Zoning Fee (Cliff Vanover, member and vital different of Platner) can at all times discover one thing unsuitable with any allow if they need.
I’ll admit I’ve a pleasant home on a pleasant avenue, south of Route 1. However, I don’t advocate shopping for up vacant land making an attempt to limit who can construct a house in Charlestown. There’s a CCA perspective of “I’ve acquired mine, screw the remainder of you.” I don’t wish to be in that class. Let others have the chance to get pleasure from our rural environment, not simply the few.
Steven J. Williams
Charlestown
Source link
