Re: “To land a second airport, state’s case must be ironclad” [Nov. 29, Opinion] and “Save our ferry system: A plea for help from an islander” [Nov. 29, Opinion]:
The editorial and Op-Ed, and the lately launched Washington State Division of Transportation Draft 2024 Freeway System Plan, present Washington state faces a monumental transportation planning problem. However our response appears to be to cut it up in items after which take care of them piecemeal. It’s irresponsible, to not point out almost unattainable, to take care of all of the transportation modes individually, since all of them have to work in concord.
We’d like a Washington Transportation Plan that features air journey (together with airport development), prepare journey (regular and excessive velocity), gentle rail and bus journey, freight motion, ferry journey and bicycle journey. And by the best way, it ought to all be built-in with our land use and development administration planning (corresponding to it’s).
However because it stands, all of those items are being studied individually. How can we probably anticipate a complete, cost-effective outcome to emerge from such a chaotic, fractured course of?
It’s too late to have 20/20 imaginative and prescient for a Imaginative and prescient 2020. That was so 1990. But it surely’s not too late to place all the problems on the desk on the identical time relatively than preventing amongst ourselves to be first.
Mark Spitzer, Seattle
Source link
