GOP Rep. Thomas Massie Exposes Dirty Tricks: ‘This Group Used Taxpayer Dollars to Silence Conservatives’

The First Modification ensures our proper to free speech. The federal government can not prohibit or take away our speech, in line with the Structure.

However is that at all times the case?

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie just lately famous {that a} government-funded group used Individuals’ tax {dollars} to censor conservatives.

“I might say this quantities to an unlawful unreported marketing campaign contribution to the Democrat celebration, but it surely’s truly a lot worse,” Massie wrote. “This group used TAXPAYER {dollars} to silence conservatives. What’s extra, they focused my official congressional twitter account for censorship.”

I might say this quantities to an unlawful unreported marketing campaign contribution to the Democrat celebration, but it surely’s truly a lot worse. This group used TAXPAYER {dollars} to silence conservatives. What’s extra, they focused my official congressional twitter account for censorship. https://t.co/o2tIWouYTT

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 16, 2023

RELATED: CNN Cans CEO Chris Licht Less Than One Month After Employees Threw a Tantrum Over Trump Town Hall

‘A Far Higher Menace to Our Consultant Democracy Than Any Overseas Nation’

Reporters Michael Shellenberger and Alex Gutentag reported on Substack:

The US government-funded Stanford Web Observatory (SIO) claims that its 2020 Election Integrity Mission (EIP) and its 2021 Virality Mission (VP) had been “non-partisan analysis coalitions.” They didn’t discriminate towards Republicans or conservatives, SIO insists.

However a brand new tranche of SIO information requested by the Home Homeland Safety Committee Chairman, Mark Inexperienced (R-TN), and Homeland Safety Subcommittee for Oversight Chairman Dan Bishop (R-SC) reveal that SIO singled out Republicans for censorship, despite the fact that Democrats engaged in comparable sorts of inaccurate or deceptive speech.

One member of Congress singled out for censorship was alarmed to study of the sample. “In striving to silence duly elected Congressmen and stop them from speaking with constituents,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) advised Public, “this government-funded censorship community has proven itself to be a far better risk to our consultant democracy than any overseas nation.”

This “government-funded” censorship is a critical risk, one which the political institution has appeared more and more comfy with as revealed by the Twitter Recordsdata. Revealed later final 12 months, the Twitter Files was a collection of reviews written by unbiased journalists, together with Shellenberger, that demonstrated how the the US authorities pressured and compelled social media corporations to control and censor information and speech in line with authorities dictates.

The information had been solely launched because of entrepreneur Elon Musk buying Twitter and transferring the corporate again in the direction of free speech, slightly than the rising censorship he was seeing.

The Stanford group apparently thought censoring Republicans for claiming election fraud was justifiable however Democrats who claimed the identical factor had been off limits.

It doesn’t matter what excuses you hear from @realDonaldTrump or @senatemajldr, voter fraud is a lie they’ve peddled for years. The reality: the GOP wins by impeding eligible residents from voting.

It’s not paranoia when it takes a court docket order to make it cease: https://t.co/LWXrIkm1Pz

— Stacey Abrams (@staceyabrams) May 18, 2020

RELATED: Time to Put CNN on Suicide Watch: Matt Gaetz Gets Higher Ratings as a Guest Host on Newsmax

Censor Republicans, However Not Democrats

The Substack report continued:

Defenders of the censorship advocacy by Stanford typically argue that solely Republicans made false statements in regards to the elections. SIO has mentioned that Republicans and Trump supporters merely unfold extra falsehoods. “EIP’s analysis decided that accounts that supported President Trump’s inaccurate assertions across the election included extra false statements than different accounts,” wrote SIO.

However many Democrats, together with Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacy Abrams, have claimed, with out proof, that Republicans have stolen elections. For instance, in Could 2020, Abrams wrote on Twitter that “the GOP wins by impeding eligible residents from voting.”

However the place Twitter executives throttled Greene’s tweet, which can’t be shared, Abrams’ tweet has over 1,200 retweets.

Utilizing our tax {dollars} to censor Individuals’ speech – whether or not it’s true, unfaithful, ‘misinformation’ or in any other case – is a direct violation of our Structure.

That the federal government now sees match to solely censor one political celebration just isn’t solely an insult, however a grave risk, to every part America has ever stood for.